The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 34
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte VLADIMIRO TEAGNO, PETER M. WELLS, JR.,
and WASIM KHOKHAR
____________
Appeal No. 2002-1587
Application No. 09/102,882
____________
HEARD: JANUARY 14, 2003
____________
Before COHEN, ABRAMS, and FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judges.
COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the refusal of the examiner to allow
claims 18 and 19, as amended (Paper No. 24) subsequent to the
final rejection (Paper No. 23). Claims 20 through 22 stand
objected to by the examiner, as set forth on page 2 of the answer
(Paper No. 28). These claims constitute all of the claims
remaining in the application.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007