Ex Parte BENDA - Page 2




               Appeal No. 2002-1649                                                                       Page 2                
               Application No. 09/405,781                                                                                       


                                           THE CLAIMED SUBJECT MATTER                                                           
                      Claims 1 and 10 are illustrative of the subject matter on appeal:                                         
                      1.  A device for purifying air comprising:                                                                
                      a reactor;                                                                                                
                      a photocatalyst located in said reactor;                                                                  
                      an ultraviolet light source located in said reactor, said ultraviolet source illuminating said            
               photocatalyst;                                                                                                   
                      a heater means located in said reactor for drawing air into said reactor by convection and                
               causing said air to rise past said photocatalyst before being expelled.                                          


                      10.  A compact device with a base and a top for purifying air that is plugged directly into               
               a wall power outlet comprising a set of power prongs protruding from the device for plugging                     
               into the wall outlet, a compartment containing a photocatalyst that is illuminated by an ultraviolet             
               light source, and opening at the base of the device for air to enter, a heater means in the device               
               near this opening for heating air entering the device and causing this air to rise past the                      
               illuminated photocatalyst, the air becoming purified, and an exit port at the top of the device for              
               the purified air to exit.                                                                                        
                                                      THE EVIDENCE                                                              
                      As evidence of unpatentability, the Examiner relies upon the following prior art                          
               references:                                                                                                      
               Dimitrik                                     3,844,741                     Oct. 29, 1974                         
               Goswami                                      5,835,840                     Nov. 10, 1998                         
                                                                                          (filed Sep. 6, 1995)                  
               Yamanaka et al. (Yamanaka)                   5,919,422                     Jul. 6, 1999                          
                                                                                          (filed Jul 26, 1996)                  








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007