Ex Parte ROITMAN et al - Page 1




          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the             
          Board.                                                                      
                                                            Paper No. 15              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                     Ex parte DANIEL B. ROITMAN, SEIJI INAOKA,                        
                             and RIOGOBERTO C. ADVINCULA                              
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 2002-1698                                  
                             Application No. 09/401,691                               
                                     __________                                       
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     __________                                       

          Before GARRIS, WARREN, and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.             
          GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on an appeal from the final rejection of            
          claims 12 and 13.  The only other claims remaining in the                   
          application, which are claims 1-11, stand withdrawn from further            
          consideration by the examiner.                                              
               The subject matter on appeal relates to a display device               
          comprising a plurality of pixels wherein a first one of said                

                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007