Ex Parte GROVER et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2002-1757                                                        
          Application No. 09/994,894                                                  

               This is a decision on an appeal which involves claims 1, 2,            
          4-29 and 38.1  These are all of the claims remaining in the                 
          application.                                                                
               The subject matter on appeal relates to an aqueous chemical            
          mechanical polishing composition comprising soluble cerium                  
          including Ce3+ ions and/or Ce4+ ions in combination with an                 
          oxidizing agent having an oxidation potential greater than Ce4+.            
          Further details of this appealed subject matter are set forth in            
          representative independent claims 1 and 38 which read as follows:           
               1. An aqueous chemical mechanical polishing composition                
          comprising:                                                                 
               the reaction product of from about 0.05 to about 10.0 wt%              
          soluble cerium including Ce3+ ions; and                                     
               an oxidizing agent having a [sic, an] oxidation potential              
          greater than Ce4+.                                                          
               38. An aqueous chemical mechanical polishing composition               
          comprising:                                                                 
               soluble cerium include Ce4+ ions;                                      

               1 Contrary to the representation of the claim 2 copy which             
          appears in the appendix of the appellants’ brief, this claim                
          depends from canceled claim 30 rather than pending claim 38.  For           
          purposes of resolving the issues before us on this appeal, we               
          will assume that claim 2 depends from claim 38.  Nevertheless,              
          the aforementioned claim 2 informality should be corrected by the           
          appellants upon return of this application to the jurisdiction of           
          the Examining Corps.  We further note that, contrary to the                 
          representation of the claim copies of the brief appendix,                   
          dependent claim 3 is canceled rather than pending and claim 9               
          depends from claim 8.                                                       
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007