Ex Parte GRANNEMAN et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2002-1760                                                        
          Serial No. 09/355,509                                                       
                                    THE INVENTION                                     
               The appellants’ claimed invention is directed toward                   
          semiconductor processing apparatus having multiple reactors and a           
          boat transfer mechanism in the same processing chamber.  Claim 31           
          is illustrative:                                                            
               31.  A semiconductor processing system for batch processing            
          of substrates in boats, comprising a substrate handling chamber,            
          a boat transfer mechanism occupying a defined footprint within a            
          process chamber sealable from the substrate handling chamber, at            
          least two reactor vessels occupying the same defined footprint,             
          and a boat lift mechanism for lifting boats from the boat                   
          transfer mechanism into one of the reactor vessels.                         

                                   THE REFERENCES                                     
          Nishi                       5,178,639               Jan. 12, 1993           
          Zinger                      5,407,449               Apr. 18, 1995           
          Ohsawa                      5,464,313               Nov.  7, 1995           
                                   THE REJECTIONS                                     
               Claims 8-14, 20-32, 34 and 35 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.           
          § 103 as being unpatentable over Zinger alone or in view of                 
          Ohsawa or Nishi.                                                            
                                       OPINION                                        
               We reverse the aforementioned rejections.                              
                                Rejection over Zinger                                 
               The claims on appeal include three independent claims, i.e.,           
          claims 8, 20 and 31, each of which claims a semiconductor                   
          processing apparatus.  Claim 8 requires a processing chamber                

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007