Ex Parte ABERSFELDER et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2002-1849                                       Page 2           
          Application No. 09/116,710                                                  


               2.  Method of displaying information, comprising:                      
                    providing an output from an information system to                 
               a holographic image generation unit; and                               
                    displaying information contained in said output in                
               the form of a hologram by generating holographic image                 
               in a holographic screen;                                               
                    wherein a property of a surface of the holographic                
               screen is that it has an intrinsic coloration which is                 
               one of black, gray and a dark color in ambient light.                  
               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Brown et al. (Brown)          4,376,950      Mar. 15, 1983                  
          Abileah et al. (Abileah)      5,629,784      May  13, 1997                  
          Branca, Jr. et al. (Branca)   6,122,079      Sep. 19, 2000                  
                                             (filed Feb. 28, 1997)                    
               Claims 2-13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being              
          unpatentable over Brown in view of Abileah and Branca.                      
               Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced by           
          the examiner and appellants regarding the above-noted rejection,            
          we make reference to the examiner's answer (Paper No. 28, mailed            
          April 22, 2002) for the examiner's complete reasoning in support            
          of the rejection, and to appellants' brief (Paper No. 27, filed             
          February 4, 2002) for appellants' arguments thereagainst.  Only             










Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007