Ex Parte ANDREASON - Page 1




            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
                                                                             Paper No. 43         
                     UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                    
                                           ____________                                           
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                      
                                     AND INTERFERENCES                                            
                                           ____________                                           
                                  Ex parte PER TOMAS ANDREASON                                    
                                           ____________                                           
                                        Appeal No. 2002-1997                                      
                                      Application No. 08/828,549                                  
                                           ____________                                           
                                             ON BRIEF1                                            
                                           ____________                                           
           Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges.                      
           BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                    


                                       DECISION ON APPEAL                                         
                 A patent examiner rejected claims 1-28.  The appellant appeals therefrom under   
           35 U.S.C. § 134(a).  We reverse.                                                       


                                          BACKGROUND                                              
                 The invention at issue on appeal connects a computer to a computer network via   
           a telephone exchange.  (Spec. at 1.)  Conventionally, when someone using a computer    
           at home wants access to his company's Intranet, he connects thereto via an Internet    
           Service Provider ("ISP").  (Appeal Br. at 2.)                                          


                 1An oral hearing was waived.  (Paper No. 42.)                                    





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007