Appeal No. 2002-2089
Application No. 09/482,237
For the above stated reasons, we cannot sustain the Examiner’s
§ 103 rejection of claims 1, 3-5, 7-9, 17-19, 22-25, 27 and 29 as
being unpatentable over Falco ‘574 in view of Brueggemann. Since
the other applied prior art has not been relied upon by the
Examiner to cure the previously discussed deficiencies, the
remaining rejections advanced on this appeal also cannot be
sustained.
66
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007