Ex Parte ALLEN - Page 6




          Appeal No. 2002-2090                                                        
          Application 08/430,311                                                      


          the dependancy of the claims can be changed subsequent to this              
          appeal.  For purposes of this appeal, we have assumed that claims           
          65 and 66 would properly depend from claim 63.                              


          Regarding the examiner’s rejection of claims 57 through 63,                 
          65, 66 and 69 through 78 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being                  
          anticipated by Givens, we note that independent claim 57 defines            
          a load bearing concrete panel structure designed to be supported            
          between at least a pair of separated support members, wherein the           
          panel structure is produced from a shrinkage and temperature                
          resistant concrete composition and the upper half of the panel              
          structure which is designed to come into contact with loads                 
               consists essentially of plain concrete, said plain concrete            
               being a structural concrete in which said plain concrete               
               carries all the flexural tensile stresses and which said               
               plain concrete is characterized as a structural concrete               
               whose maximum flexural strength is attained at the cracking            
               load thereof, said plain concrete having a tensile strength            
               less than about 750 pounds per square inch.                            

          Claim 57 also recites that the upper half of the concrete panel             
          structure, intermediate the two furthest separated support                  
          members, is “free of flexural reinforcing means for carrying                
          bending moment tension stresses in said panel structure” and that           



                                          6                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007