The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 31
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte GREGORY S. LINDHORST,
STEPHEN J. MILLET
and JOHN P. SHEWCHUK
____________
Appeal No. 2002-2182
Application No. 09/223,565
____________
HEARD: June 12, 2003
____________
Before RUGGIERO, GROSS, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent
Judges.
RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal from the final rejection of
claims 1-13. At page 3 of the Answer, the Examiner indicates that
claims 4-9 and 12 have now been allowed. Accordingly, only the
rejection of claims 1-3, 10, 11, and 13 is before us on appeal.
The disclosed invention relates to the development of web
sites in which web page script files and components are treated as
objects with exposed methods and properties. More particularly, at
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007