Ex Parte Bouyoucos - Page 2




              Appeal No. 2002-2194                                                                  Page 2                
              Application No. 09/594,532                                                                                  


                                                    BACKGROUND                                                            
                     The appellant's invention relates to a towed acoustic source array of marine                         
              sources such as vibrator sources and is especially suitable for use as a towed                              
              geophysical array for underwater geophysical exploration applications (specification, p.                    
              1).  A copy of the claims under appeal is set forth in the appendix to the appellant's                      
              brief.                                                                                                      


                     The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the                      
              appealed claims are:                                                                                        
              Lefebvre                                   3,469,551                    Sept. 30, 1969                      
              Spink et al.                               3,560,912                    Feb. 2, 1971                        
              (Spink)                                                                                                     
              Chaverebiere de Sal et al.                 3,987,745                    Oct. 26, 1976                       
              (Chaverebiere de Sal)                                                                                       
              Bjerkoy                                    5,157,636                    Oct. 20, 1992                       
              Elholm                                     5,532,975                    July 2, 1996                        
              Deplante et al.                            5,784,335                    July 21, 1998                       
              (Deplante)                                                                                                  



                     Claims 1, 4 and 5 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable                         
              over Spink in view of Elholm and Lefebvre.                                                                  


                     Claim 2 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Spink                       
              in view of Elholm and Lefebvre and Deplante.                                                                







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007