Ex Parte Cody et al - Page 6




          Appeal No. 2002-2250                                                        
          Application No. 09/519,823                                                  

          assumed piles P associated with the concrete mat or foundation              
          disclosed by Lejeck for supporting a blast furnace stove with               
          piles of the type disclosed by Thornley for supporting the                  
          foundation of a massive building structure stems from hindsight             
          knowledge impermissibly derived from the appellants’ disclosure.            
               Hence, we shall not sustain the standing 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)            
          rejection of independent claims 1, 8, 14, 18 and 20, and                    
          dependent claims 2 through 7, 9 through 13, 15 through 17 and 19,           
          as being unpatentable over Lejeck in view of Thornley.                      
                                      SUMMARY                                         
               The decision of the examiner to reject claims 1 through 20             
          is reversed.                                                                
                                     REVERSED                                         
















                                          6                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007