Ex Parte Ishida et al - Page 1




          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the             
          Board.                                                                      
                                                            Paper No. 26              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
              Ex parte HIDETOSHI ISHIDA, ATSUSHI NOMA, and DAISUKE UEDA               
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 2003-0173                                  
                               Application 09/484,473                                 
                                     ___________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     ___________                                      

          Before WARREN, OWENS and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent            
          Judges.                                                                     
          OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         
                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 8 and 11.            
          Claims 5, 7, 9, 10, 12 and 13, which are all of the other claims            
          remaining in the application, stand withdrawn from consideration            
          by the examiner as being directed toward a nonelected invention.            






                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007