Ex Parte FLORIO et al - Page 1




          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the             
          Board.                                                                      
                                                            Paper No. 25              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                       Ex parte ANDREA FLORIO and FABIO BUCCI                         
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 2003-0222                                  
                               Application 09/555,910                                 
                                     ___________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     ___________                                      

          Before COHEN, ABRAMS, and FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent                  
          Judges.                                                                     
          FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                     

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   


          This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                      
          rejection of claims 11 and 13 through 19, which are all of the              
          claims remaining in this application.  Claims 1 through 10 and 12           
          have been canceled.                                                         


          Appellants’ invention is directed to a valve with a ball of                 
          controlled deformation.  Independent claim 11 is representative             

                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007