The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 26
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte KAORI KONDOH,
TETSUYA MASUISHI,
HIROSHI KOIKE,
RIE KOBAYASHI,
SATOSHI TAKEUCHI,
AKIRA MATOIKE,
and
JUN NITTA
_____________
Appeal No. 2003-0427
Application No. 09/808,950
______________
HEARD: AUGUST 20, 2003
_______________
Before HAIRSTON, GROSS, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims
15 through 26.
The disclosed invention relates to a cyber mall system and
method for performing an agency selling of goods.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007