Appeal No. 2003-0470
Application 09/671,870
claimed by appellant. Accordingly, since all the limita-
tions of appellant’s claims 5, 6 and 9 through 13 are not
found in Paulson, either expressly or under principles of
inherency, it follows that the examiner's rejection of those
claims under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) relying on Paulson will not
be sustained.
In accordance with the foregoing, it is clear that
the decision of the examiner is reversed.
REVERSED
CHARLES E. FRANKFORT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JOHN P. MCQUADE ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
JEFFREY V. NASE )
Administrative Patent Judge )
CEF:psb
12
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007