Ex Parte Jolly et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2003-0607                                                        
          Application 09/532,968                                                      



          directed to a non-elected invention.1  See Final Rejection, Paper           
          No. 7, mailed March 21, 2002, page 2 (citing 37 CFR § 1.142(b)).            
                    Claim 1 is representative of the subject matter on                
          appeal and is reproduced below:                                             
                    1.  A method of building up an optical fiber preform in           
          an installation provided with means enabling a preform held                 
          horizontally at ends of the preform between two mounting points             
          by supporting the ends of the preform with end pieces for                   
          rotation about an axis of the preform and for relative movement             
          in a direction parallel to the axis of the preform said                     
          installation also being provided with heater means for heating              
          the preform by means of a plasma torch, which heater means is               
          disposed radially relative to said preform and is associated with           
          material supply means, so as to enable the preform to be                    
          manufactured in successive passes corresponding to the preform              
          and the torch being displaced relative to each other, certain               
          ones of the passes carried out with material being supplied and             
          certain other ones of the passes being carried out without                  
          material being supplied, so that each successive pass leads to a            
          new layer of material being deposited on the preform when                   
          material is supplied and to the most recent layer deposited being           
          glazed when material is not supplied, said method interposing a             
          one-ended reduction in the length of at least one layer, during a           
          pass and starting from one new layer that is an intermediate                
          layer, while a succession of concentric layers of material are              
          being deposited on the preform in a manner such that the                    

               1 Appellants have requested that the Board also review                 
          claims 9-17.  See Appeal Brief, Paper No. 11, received August 21,           
          2002, page 2.  Appellants are reminded that any request for                 
          reconsideration from a requirement for restriction made final               
          by the examiner must be made by petition to the Commissioner.               
          “Petition may be deferred until after final action on or                    
          allowance of claims to the invention elected, but must be filed             
          not later than appeal.  A petition will not be considered if                
          reconsideration of the requirement was not requested (see                   
          § 1.181).”  37 CFR § 1.144 (July 1, 2002).                                  
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007