Appeal No. 2003-0646
Application No. 09/250,154
Claim 7 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Burns and Chase and in further view of Takase.
We note that the Examiner relies on Burns for the above
limitations. Furthermore, we note that Takase does not provide
the missing pieces. Therefore, we will not sustain this
rejection for the same reasons as above.
In view of the foregoing, we have not sustained the
Examiner’s rejection of claims 4 through 7 under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
REVERSED
MICHAEL R. FLEMING )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
ANITA PELLMAN GROSS ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
STUART S. LEVY )
Administrative Patent Judge )
MRF:svt
12
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007