The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte JOHN DAVID KAEWELL, JR. and SCOTT DAVID KURTZ
__________
Appeal No. 2003-0660
Application No. 09/791,2591
____________
HEARD: JULY 16, 2003
____________
Before RUGGIERO, DIXON and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges.
SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the Examiner’s final
rejection of claims 1-14, which are all of the claims pending in
this application.
We reverse.
1 Application for patent filed February 23, 2001, which is a
continuation of Application No. 09/356,845, filed July, 19, 1999, which is a
continuation of Application No. 08/796,973, filed February 7, 1997, now U.S.
Patent No. 5,930,297, which is a continuation of Application No. 08/588,073,
filed January 17, 1996, now U.S. Patent No. 5,625,653, which is a continuation
of Application No. 08/347,835, filed December 1, 1994, now U.S. Patent No.
5,495,508, which is a continuation of Application No. 08/104,322, filed August
9, 1993, now abandoned, which is a continuation of Application No. 07/438,618,
filed November 20, 1989, now abandoned, which is a continuation of Application
No. 07/123,395, filed November 20, 1987, now U.S. Patent No. 4,935,927.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007