Ex Parte VINEYARDS, JR. et al - Page 3




          Appeal No. 2003-0766                                                         
          Application No. 09/266,325                                                   

               The Examiner relies on the following references in rejecting            
          the claims:                                                                  
          Niwa et al. (Niwa)            5,671,366       Sep. 23, 1997                  
          Stein                         5,684,952       Nov.  4, 1997                  
          Nguyen et al. (Nguyen)        5,887,163       Mar. 23, 1999                  
                                                   (filed Apr. 4, 1997)                
          Lister et al. (Lister)        5,966,540       Oct. 12, 1999                  
                                                   (filed Jul. 23, 1997)               
          Shoji et al. (Shoji)          6,031,527       Feb. 29, 2000                  
                                                   (filed Jul. 12, 1996)               
          Dougherty et al. (Dougherty) 6,076,734        Jun. 20, 2000                  
                                              (filed Oct. 10, 1997)                    
          Dean et al. (Dean)            6,202,206       Mar. 13, 2001                  
                                                   (filed May 14, 1998)                
               Claims 1, 5, 9, 16 and 20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                
          § 102(b) as being anticipated by Niwa.                                       
               Claims 3, 4, 11 and 12 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                   
          § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Niwa and Shoji.                          
               Claims 6, 7, 13 and 14 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                   
          § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Niwa and Lister.                         
               Claims 8 and 15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as              
          being unpatentable over Niwa and Nguyen.                                     
               Claim 17 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being              
          unpatentable over Niwa and Dean.                                             
               Claim 18 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being              
          unpatentable over Niwa, Dean and Stein.                                      

                                          3                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007