Ex Parte Tai et al - Page 1




                           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and             
                                                   is not binding precedent of the Board.                                             
                                                                                                           Paper No. 17               
                                    UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                         
                                                            ____________                                                              
                                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                          
                                                      AND INTERFERENCES                                                               
                                                            ____________                                                              
                                           Ex parte YU-CHONG TAI, FUKANG JIANG,                                                       
                                                                  and                                                                 
                                                           CHIHMING HO                                                                
                                                            ____________                                                              
                                                        Appeal No. 2003-0799                                                          
                                                     Application No. 09/567,818                                                       
                                                            ____________                                                              
                                                              ON BRIEF                                                                
                                                            ____________                                                              
               Before GARRIS, TIMM, and MOORE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                          
               TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                     



                                                      DECISION ON APPEAL                                                              
                       This appeal involves claims 1 and 3-5 which are all the claims pending in the application.                     
               We have jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.                                                      















Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007