Ex Parte SKLEDAR et al - Page 1




          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the             
          Board.                                                                      
                                                               Paper No. 24           

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                              Ex parte GREGG M. SKLEDAR                               
                                         and                                          
                                   KENNETH D. HOPE                                    
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 2003-0808                                  
                             Application No. 09/343,334                               
                                     ___________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     ___________                                      
          Before WARREN, TIMM, and DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judges.            
          DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judge.                                      


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134                  
          (2002) from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 through              
          28 (final Office action mailed Mar. 20, 2002, paper 15), which              
          are all the claims pending in the above-identified application.             
               The subject matter on appeal relates to a method of                    
          producing a high oxidative stability polyalphaolefin (claims 1-             
          12 and 26-28), a lubricant composition comprising a                         






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007