Ex Parte Junghans - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2003-1147                                                        
          Application No. 09/598,580                                                  


          Claims 1 and 11 are representative of the subject matter on                 
          appeal and are produced below:                                              

          1.  A method of controlling the supply of ink in a printing                 
          machine wherein the ink is differently guided zonally on an ink-            
          fountain roller transversely to the printing direction, and is              
          transferred by a vibrator roller to a distributor roller, which             
          comprises metering the ink zonally for counteracting ink transfer           
          disturbances caused by a stroke movement of the distributor                 
          roller, so as to minimize the disturbances automatically to at              
          least an effective extent.                                                  

          11.  A method of controlling the supply of ink in a printing                
          machine, which comprises:                                                   
          metering zonally differentiated ink on an ink-fountain roller               
          transversely to a printing direction;                                       
          transferring the ink by a vibrator roller to a distributor                  
          roller; and                                                                 
          performing the step of zonally metering the ink to counteract ink           
          transfer disturbances caused by a stroke movement of the                    
          distributor roller.                                                         

               The reference relied upon by the examiner is:                          
          Thünker et al. (Thünker)   5,701,817       Dec.  30, 1997                   

                                 GROUND OF REJECTION                                  
               Claims 1-3 and 11-14 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)           
          as anticipated by Thünker.                                                  
               We affirm.                                                             


                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007