Ex Parte PORTMANN et al - Page 1



                       The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written      
                              for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.               

                                                                              Paper No. 21             

                     UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                         
                                             __________                                                

                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                           
                                      AND INTERFERENCES                                                
                                             __________                                                
                                    Ex parte ROBERT PORTMANN,                                          
                                    URS CHRISTOPH HOFMEIER,                                            
                                        ANDREAS BURKHARD,                                              
                                       WALTER SCHERRER, and                                            
                                       MARTIN SZELAGIEWICZ                                             
                                         Appeal No. 2003-1199                                          
                                       Application No. 09/125,329                                      
                                             __________                                                
                                              ON BRIEF                                                 
                                             __________                                                
            WINTERS, ADAMS, and GREEN,  Administrative Patent Judges.                                  
            WINTERS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                      
                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                             
                  This appeal was taken from the examiner's decision rejecting claims 1 through 9,     
            13, 14, 16 through 21, 26, 28, 30, and 31, which are all of the claims remaining in the    
            application.                                                                               


                                             The Invention                                             
                  The compound 1-(2,6-difluorobenzyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazole-4-carboxamide was              
            known in the art at the time applicants' invention was made (specification, page 1).       
            Valuable pharmacological properties have been attributed to this compound; it may be       





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007