The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte WENZONG CHEN,
JEFFREY A. MATASEK and IGOR GROIS
_______________
Appeal No. 2003-1279
Application No. 09/455,621
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before OWENS, PAWLIKOWSKI, and POTEATE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
POTEATE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s refusal to allow claims 1, 4 and 5. Claims 11-15 are
allowed and claims 2, 3 and 6-10 have been indicated as allowable
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007