Ex Parte Kotecki et al - Page 2


         Appeal No. 2003-1300                                                       
         Application No. 09/643,372                                                 

         application.2                                                              
              The subject matter on appeal relates to a method for                  
         fabricating a dual-diameter electrical conductor for use in a              
         microelectronic structure, wherein a neck portion of the                   
         conductor is fabricated with a diameter smaller than a                     
         lithographically defined diameter of a body portion.                       
         (Specification, pages 1-9.)  According to the appellants (id. at           
         page 1), “[t]he use of this dual-diameter plug geometry provides           
         a misalignment tolerance wherein the body portion of the plug is           
         protected from exposure to subsequently deposited materials and            
         process ambients when only the neck portion of the plug is                 
         completely overlapped by a subsequentially [sic] deposited                 
         conductor.”  Further details of this appealed subject matter are           
         recited in representative claim 37 and 44, the only independent            
         claims on appeal, reproduced below:                                        
                   37.  A method for fabricating a dual-diameter                    
              electrical conductor comprising the steps of:                         
                   providing a substrate having a first conductive                  
              region formed of a first conductive material,                         
                   depositing a layer of a first dielectric material                
              on said substrate,                                                    

                                                                                   
              2  In reply to the final Office action mailed Apr. 26, 2002           
         (paper 8), the appellants submitted an amendment pursuant to 37            
         CFR § 1.116 (2001) on Jun. 26, 2002 (paper 9), proposing                   
         change(s) to claim 44.  The examiner indicated that this                   
         amendment will be entered for purposes of this appeal.                     
         (Advisory action mailed Jul. 29, 2002 (paper 10).                          

                                         2                                          



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007