Ex Parte KEITH et al - Page 8



          Appeal No. 2003-1337                                                        
          Serial No. 08/480,411                                                       
          thermoplastic material that saturates Waddell’s braid to be the             
          appellants’ medial layer (answer, page 6).  This thermoplastic              
          material, however, saturates the entire braid layer and,                    
          therefore, serves as the matrix layer for the entire braid.                 
          Thus, there is no remainder of the braid for which the outer                
          thermoplastic layer can function as the braid matrix layer.  For            
          this additional reason Waddell does not anticipate the microtube            
          claimed in the appellants’ claim 1.                                         
               We therefore reverse the rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)            
          over Waddell of claim 1 and claim 3 which depend therefrom.                 
                                      Claim 32                                        
               Waddell fails to anticipate the microtube claimed in the               
          appellants’ claim 32 because this claim requires cured resin                
          layers whereas, as discussed above regarding the rejection of               
          claim 1, Waddell’s layers are thermoplastic.                                
               Accordingly, we reverse the rejection of claim 32 under                
          35 U.S.C. § 102(b) over Waddell.                                            
                      Rejection of claims 1-7, 9-13 and 27-37                         
                 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Waddell in view of Pray                   
                                  Claims 27 and 28                                    
               As discussed above regarding the rejection under 35 U.S.C.             
          § 102(b), the microtube claimed in the appellants’ claim 27 is              
          anticipated by Waddell.  For this reason and because anticipation           

                                          8                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007