Ex Parte WANG et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2003-1442                                                        
          Application No. 09/359,037                                                  

               1.   An optical luminescent display device, comprising:                
                    a luminescent material;                                           
                    a first energy source which generates a first                     
               radiant energy for continuously illuminating said                      
               luminescent material without causing said luminescent                  
               material to emit visible light; and                                    
                    a second energy source which generates a second                   
               radiant energy for selectively illuminating said                       
               luminescent material to thereby control emission of                    
               visible light.                                                         
               The following references are relied on by the examiner:                
               Storti et al. (Storti)        5,029,253      Jul. 02, 1991             
               Johnson et al. (Johnson)      5,598,053      Jan. 28, 1997             
               Okajima et al. (Okajima)      5,700,591      Dec. 23, 1997             
               DeLuca et al. (DeLuca)        6,031,511      Feb. 29, 2000             
                                             (filed Jun. 10, 1997)                    
               Claims 1 through 7, 22, 39, 40, 44, 47, 54, and 55 stand               
          rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated by DeLuca.           
          The examiner considers claims 1, 2, 6, 7, 39 and 40 as being                
          anticipated under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) by Storti.  Claims 12,                 
          13, 15 through 17, 42, 45, 48, 49 and 57 stand rejected under               
          35 U.S.C. § 102(b)as being anticipated by Johnson.  This                    
          reference is also relied upon by the examiner under 35 U.S.C.               
          § 103 with Okajima to reject claims 14 and 46.                              
               Rather that repeat the positions of the appellants and the             
          examiner, reference is made to the brief and reply brief for                



                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007