Ex Parte Gupta et al - Page 6




         Appeal No. 2003-1447                                                       
         Application No. 09/689,720                                                 
              II. The Rejection of Claims 8 and 17 under 35 U.S.C. §103(a)          
              as being unpatentable over Takagi.                                    

              The examiner has found that Takagai discloses all of the              
         limitations of the claimed invention, except for a rib element             
         that is molded directly into the faceplate.  (Examiner’s Answer,           
         page 6, lines 11-12).  The examiner concludes that it would have           
         been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the           
         invention was made to use a rib element molded directly into the           
         faceplate in order to prevent shock and make a low cost for                
         manufacturing.                                                             
              As this rejection relies in part on the rejection we have             
         previously reversed, we reverse this rejection for the reasons             
         enumerated above.                                                          

















                                         6                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007