Ex Parte TOLMAN - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2003-1573                                                        
          Application No. 08/854,407                                                  


               According to appellant, the invention is directed to a method          
          of making an efficient magnetoresistive (MR) sensor for which the           
          output voltage signal has been maximized for a given applied sense          
          current, with an increase in resistivity of the bias layer and the          
          spacer layer minimizing the shunt of sense current through these            
          layers (Brief, page 2).  A further understanding of the invention           
          may be seen from representative independent claims 1 and 9, a copy          
          of which may be found in Appendix A of the Brief.                           
               The examiner has relied upon the following references as               
          evidence of obviousness:                                                    
          Cuomo et al. (Cuomo)          4,231,816          Nov. 04, 1980              
          Koyama et al. (Koyama)        4,364,099          Dec. 14, 1982              
          Jenson                        4,897,288          Jan. 30, 1990              
          Osano et al. (Osano)          5,429,731          Jul. 04, 1995              
          Bonyhard et al. (Bonyhard)    5,495,378          Feb. 27, 1996              
          Matsushita                    01152255           Jun. 14, 1989              
          (published Japanese patent application)2                                    
               The claims on appeal stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)           
          as unpatentable over Bonyhard in view of Jenson, Koyama, Osano,             

               2The inventors of this application are Akihiro et al.                  
          (Matsushita is the applicant).  Since the examiner and appellant            
          refer to this document as “Matsushita” (Brief, page 5; Answer,              
          page 3), we will also use this terminology.  We note that the               
          examiner only relies upon a Patent Abstract of this document                
          (Answer, page 8, last paragraph), but the record now contains a             
          full English translation of this document (see Paper No. 30 dated           
          Mar. 16, 2003).  Accordingly, we refer to and cite from the full            
          English translation now of record.                                          
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007