Appeal No. 2003-1648 Page 8
Application No. 09/648,359
which makes up for the deficiencies of Steffens, Fayyad and Moroto discussed above
regarding claim 11. Accordingly, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 16 and
18 to 20 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is also reversed.
CONCLUSION
To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 1, 2, 5 to 7, 9, 11,
13, 14 and 16 to 21 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.
REVERSED
NEAL E. ABRAMS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JEFFREY V. NASE ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
JENNIFER D. BAHR )
Administrative Patent Judge )
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007