Ex Parte Miller - Page 1




             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for                     
                   publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                       
                                                                                     Paper No. 16               
                            UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                           
                                                ____________                                                    
                                 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                             
                                            AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                                ____________                                                    
                                          Ex parte ARTHUR MILLER                                                
                                                ____________                                                    
                                             Appeal No. 2003-1760                                               
                                          Application No. 29/159,145                                            
                                                ____________                                                    
                                                  ON BRIEF                                                      
                                                ____________                                                    
             Before NASE, BLANKENSHIP, and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judges.                           
             BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                          




                                            DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                   This is a decision on appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of the following            
             design claim:                                                                                      
                   The ornamental design for AN INFLATABLE SPORTS BALL IN THE STYLE OF                          
             A BASKETBALL, as shown and described.                                                              
                   We reverse.                                                                                  










Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007