Ex Parte Koenig et al - Page 2




               Appeal No. 2003-1844                                                                          Page 2                   
               Application No. 09/643,130                                                                                             


                                                         BACKGROUND                                                                   
                       The appellants' invention generally relates to a method of playing a game                                      
               utilizing a plurality of sound lines which are components of a song or ensemble, each of                               
               which may be reproduced either alone or together with any number of the other sound                                    
               lines (specification, p. 1).  A copy of the claims under appeal is set forth in the appendix                           
               to the appellants' brief.                                                                                              


                       Claims 1 to 22 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, as                                      
               being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter                         
               which the appellants regard as the invention.                                                                          


                       Claims 23, 25, 26 and 28 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being                                      
               anticipated by U.S. Patent No. 5,812,6881 to Gibson.                                                                   


                       Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced by the examiner and                                  
               the appellants regarding the above-noted rejections, we make reference to the final                                    
               rejection (Paper No. 8, mailed April 24, 2002) and the answer (Paper No. 13, mailed                                    
               January 28, 2003) for the examiner's complete reasoning in support of the rejections,                                  



                       1 Issued September 22, 1998.                                                                                   







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007