The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and
is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ERIC M. BREITUNG,
EELCO M.S. van HAMERSVELD,
DANIEL ROBERT OLSON
and MARC BRIAN WISNUDEL
____________
Appeal No. 2003-1892
Application No. 09/681,288
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before GARRIS, JEFFREY T. SMITH and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative
Patent Judges.
JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Applicants appeal the decision of the Primary Examiner finally rejecting
claims 1 to 23 and 26 to 32.1 We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 134.2
1 According to the Examiner, Final Rejection page 1, the subject matter claims 24 and
25 has been allowed.
2 In rendering this decision, we have considered Appellants’ arguments presented in
the Brief filed January 21, 2003 and the Reply Brief filed June 03, 2003.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007