Ex Parte Egitto et al - Page 1




                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered                
                       today was not written for publication and                      
                         is not binding precedent of the Board.                       
                                                            Paper No. 14              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                   _______________                                    
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                   _______________                                    
                    Ex parte FRANK D. EGITTO, MICHAEL A. GAYNES,                      
                                 RAMESH R. KODNANI,                                   
                        LUIS J. MATIENZO and MARK V. PIERSON                          
                                   _______________                                    
                                Appeal No. 2003-2014                                  
                             Application No. 09/757,185                               
                                   _______________                                    
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                   _______________                                    
          Before GARRIS, WARREN, and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent               
          Judges.                                                                     
          GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        
                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on an appeal which involves claims 11-13            
          and 26-29.  The only other claims remaining in the application,             
          which are claims 14, 15 and 25, stand objected to by the examiner           
          but otherwise allowable.                                                    




                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007