Ex Parte Yanagi - Page 1




               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not     
               written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.     

                                                            Paper No. 16              


                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                    _____________                                     
                           BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                         
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                    _____________                                     
                               Ex parte TOSHIKI YANAGI                                
                                    _____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 2004-0071                                 
                              Application No. 09/888,445                              
                                    ______________                                    
                                    ON BRIEF                                          
                                    _______________                                   

          Before CAROFF, GARRIS, and MOORE, Administrative Patent Judges.             
          CAROFF, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        
                                                                                     
                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on appeal from the examiner’s final                 
          rejection of claim 1.  As acknowledged in appellant’s reply                 
          brief, claim 2, the only other claim in appellant’s application,            
          stands withdrawn from consideration as being drawn to a non-                
          elected invention and, thus, is not before us on appeal.                    
               Claim 1, the sole claim on appeal, is directed to a porous             
          sheet substrate from which pieces are to be cut or removed.  In             
          order to facilitate later removal of the pieces from the                    








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007