Court Opinions

State Laws

US Code

US Constitution

Ex Parte PONTECORVO - Page 1

Legal Research Home > Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences > 2003 > Ex Parte PONTECORVO - Page 1

          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the             
          Board.                                                                      
                                                            Paper No. 12              
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                            Ex parte GARY J. PONTECORVO                               
                            ___________                                               
                                Appeal No. 2004-0120                                  
                             Application No. 09/898,334                               
                                     __________                                       
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                      _________                                       
          Before WALTZ, WARREN, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.              
          WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on an appeal from the primary examiner’s            
          final rejection of claims 1 through 20, which are the only claims           
          pending in this application.  We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35           
          U.S.C. § 134.                                                               
               According to appellant, the invention is directed to a                 
          binder for holding a plurality of sheets, including a front                 
          member, a back member, and a spine connecting means, where at               
          least one whiteboard is attached to the outside surface of the              
          front member, the inside surface of the front member, or the                






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007