KLAVENESS et al. V. KLAVENESS et al. V. SCHNEIDER et al. - Page 3


                                                                   0                                 


           Interference No. 104,154                                                                  

                 In accordance with paragraph (a) of the show cause order,                           
           which appears at pages 55-56 of the decision, judgment on the                             
           issue of priority as to the subject matter of Count 1 is hereby                           
           entered against the Klaveness et al. ("Klaveness") claims which                           
           correspond to Count 1 (i.e., claims 3-8, 17, 19, 20, 29-32, and                           
           38 of the Klaveness 1490 patent, claims 3-10, 19, 20, 23, 24, 33                          
           37, and 44 Klaveness 1413 patent; and claims So and 55 of                                 
           Klaveness reissue application 09/227,410) and in favor of the                             
           Schneider et al. ("Schneider") claims that correspond to Count 1                          
           (i.e., application claims 57-75 and 80).                                                  
                 In accordance with paragraph (b) of the show cause order,                           
           judgment is hereby entered against claims 3-8, 17, 19, 20, 29-32,                         
           and 38 of the 1490 patent and claims 3-10, 19, 20, 23, 24, 33-37,                         
           and 44 of the 1413 patent for failing to satisfy the written                              
           description requirement of 35 U.S.C. § 112, 1 1. In addition,                             
           judgment is entered against Schneider's claims 57, 60-62, 65, 66,                         
           and 69-75 for uripatentability under the written description                              
           requirement of 35 U.S.C. § 112, ý 1 and against Schneider's                               
           claims 58, 59, 63, 64, 67, 68, and 80 for indefiniteness under                            
           35 U.S.C. 5 112, 1 2.                                                                     








                                                  3                                                  







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007