KATSUTOSHI et al. V. NATSUKA et al. - Page 3





                Interference 104,224                                                                                    
                     The parties did not call the APJ.                                                                  
                     Natsuka stands under an Order to Show Cause.                                                       
                     Natsuka did not file a record (due July 28, 2003). Paper No. 131, p. 5.                            
                     Natsuka did not file a brief (due September 15, 2003). Paper No. 131, p. 5.                        
                     Accordingly, we hold that Natsuka has failed to sustain its burden of showing                      
               cause why judgment should not be entered against it.                                                     




























                                                           3                                                            






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007