The opinion in support of the decision being
entered today is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper 23
Filed by: Interference Trial Section Merits Panel
Box Interference Filed:
Washington, D.C. 20231 22 January 2003
Tel: 703-308-9797
Fax: 703-305-0942
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
F "ý AAAED'Ir
JOHN W. PARCE, and ANNE R. KOPF-SILL
Junior Party JAR 2 9, '?LR"3
(U.S. Patent 5,869,004),
Pa. &. OFFiCE
V. GOM"00V PX`.ýVIT A7PEALS
AND gITERVERLNCES
PAUL YAGER, JAMES P. BRODY, MARK R. HOLL,
FRED K. FORSTER and PAUL C. GALAMBOS
Senior Party
(Application 09/500,398).
Patent Interference No. 104,811
Before: SCHAFER, LEE and TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judges.
SCHAFER, Administrative Patent Judg
JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO 37 CFR § 1.662
Senior party Yager has expressly abandoned involved Application, 09/500,398. See Paper
22. Pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.662(a), the abandonment of an involved application is treated as a
request for entry of an adverse judgment. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that judgment on priority as to the subject matter of Count I (Paper 1, p. 5), is
awarded against the senior party, PAUL YAGER, JAMES P. BRODY, MARK R. HOLL, FRED K.
FORSTER and PAUL C. GALAMBOS;
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007