0
Interference No. 105,027 Paper 28
Rosenthal v. Hohn Page 2
FURTHER ORDERED that junior party Rosenthal is not entitled to a patent containing
claims 33 and 36-41 of Rosenthal's 08/379,236 application, which correspond to Count 1; and
FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this decision be entered in the administrative
record of Rosenthal's 08/379,236 application and Hohn's 08/342,457 patent.
RICHARD E. SCHAFER
Administrative Patent Judge BOARD OF PATENT
APPEALS AND
RICHARD TORCZON INTERFERENCES
Administrative Patent Judge
INTERFERENCE
CAROL A. SPIEGEL TRIAL SECTION
Administrative Patent Judge
cc (electronic mail):
Counsel for Rosenthal (real party-in-interest, Genentech, Inc.): John P. Isacson and Ginger R.
Drege of Heller Ehrman White & McAuliffe.
Counsel for Hohn (real party-in-interest - Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Amgen Inc.; and
Amgen-Regencron Partners): Thomas E. Friebel and Margaret Brivardo of Pennie &
Edmonds LLP.
Notice: Any agreement or understanding between parties to this interference, including any collateral agreements
referred to therein, made in connection with or in contemplation of the terminatiDn of the interference, shall be in writing
and a true copythereof filed in theUnited States Patent and Trademark Office before termination ofthe interference as
between said parties tothe agreement or understanding. 35 U.S.C. 135(c); 37 C.F.R. § 1.661.
Page: Previous 1 2
Last modified: November 3, 2007