Interference 105,039 Paper No. 28
Andree v. Klintz Page 5
Count 2:
15. Count 2 in this interference is:
The composition of matter according to claim 56 of
Klintz, U.S. Application Serial No. 09/733,554.
16. The claims of the parties that correspond to Count 2
are:
Andree: 5
Klintz: 56.
17. Count 2 relates to diazo-substituted 3-phenyluracils
that are intermediates - i.e., they can be transformed - to many
compounds within the genus and subgenus of compounds covered by
Count 1.
18. The claims of the parties that do not correspond to
Count 2 are:
Andree: 1-4, 6
Klintz: 1-7, 12, 13, 15, 16, 26-30, 36, 37, 39, 40,
43-51, 53-55.
19. The claims of the parties that do not correspond to
either Count 1 or Count 2, and hence that are not involved in
this interference, are:
Andree: none
Klintz: 6, 29, 44.
20. Klintz's claims 53-56 were "copied" from Andree's
claims in order to provoke this interference. (Exhibit 2005 at
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007