LOK V. Boutros et al. - Page 4




                      12. The claims of the parties are:                                                                               
                              Boutros: 29-37                                                                                           
                              Lok: 1-15                                                                                                
                      13. The following claims were originally designated as corresponding to count 1:                                 
                              Boutros: 29-31 and 34-37                                                                                 
                              Lok: 1-8, 10 and 13-15                                                                                   
                      14. The following claims were originally designated as corresponding to count 2:                                 
                              Boutros: 32 and 33                                                                                       
                              Lok: 11 and 12                                                                                           
                      15. The following claims were originally designated as not corresponding to either count                         
               I or count 2:                                                                                                           

                              Boutros: none                                                                                            
                              Lok: 9                                                                                                   
                      C. Discussion                                                                                                    

                      Boutros and Lok jointly filed a preliminary motion under 37 CFR § 1.633(b) for no                                
               interference-in-fact between Boutros's claims 29-31 and any one of Lok's claims 1-8, 10 and 13                          
               15, which correspond to count 11. Additionally, Lok filed an unopposed revised preliminary                              
               motion I for no interference-in-fact between Boutros claims 32 and 33 and Lok's claims I I and                          
               12, which correspond to count 2.                                                                                        




                        Originally designated claims 34-37 as corresponding to count I have been cancelled                             
               (Paper 57).                                                                                                             
                                                                  4                                                                    







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007