The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 26
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte JOHN T. WOLFE, JOO H. SONG,
CHRISTAFOR E. SUNDSTROM, DAVID W. RECORD,
DONALD J. TOWNSEND, KEVIN B. BRODERICK,
and
PHILIP G. SCHNELL
__________
Appeal No. 1998-1722
Application No. 08/527,018
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before WARREN, TIMM, and DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judges.
DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
(2003) from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 through
20 (final Office action mailed Mar. 7, 1997, paper 9), which are
all the claims pending in the above-identified application.
The subject matter on appeal relates to a method of
manufacturing chewing gum (claims 1-4, 6-9, 11, 12, 14-17, 19,
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007