The opinion in support of the decision being
entered today is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper 28
By: Trial Section Merits Panel
Box Interference Filed: April 4, 2003
Washington, D.C. 20231
Tel: 703-308-9797
Fax: 703-305-0942
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
MICHEL MONOD, AGNES DOUMAS, MICHAEL AFFOLTER
and PETER VAN DEN BROEK
Junior Party,
U.S. Patent 6,309,868
v.
ALEXANDER BLINKOVSKY, KIMBERLY BROWN,
MICHAEL W. REY, ALAN KLOTZ,
and TONY BYUN
Senior Party
Application 09/079,592
_______________
Patent Interference No. 104,838 (CAS)
_______________
Before: SCHAFER, TORCZON and SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judges.
SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judge.
JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO 37 CFR § 1.662
Upon consideration of Monod's REQUEST FOR ADVERSE JUDGMENT
UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 1.662 (PAPER 27), it is
Page: 1 2 3 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007