Interference No. 105,000
Page No. 2
entered against Bansleben. 37 C.F.R. §1.662.
Upon consideration of the record, it is:
that judgment on priority as to Count 1 (Notice Declaring Interference,
Paper No. 1, page 6), the sole count in the interference, is awarded Junior Party
Bansleben.
that Junior Party Bansleben is not entitled to a patent containing
claims 1, 12-37 and 210-220 of Bansleben et al., U.S. Patent Application 09/568,656 as these
claims correspond to Count 1.
that a copy of this final decision shall be placed and given a
paper number in the file of Johnson et al., U.S. Application No. 09/417,323 and Bansleben et al.,
U.S. Patent Application 09/568,656.
that if there is a settlement agreement, attention is directed to
35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and 37 CFR § 1.661.
CAROL A. SPIEGEL )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
SALLY GARDNER-LANE ) APPEALS
Page: Previous 1 2 3 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007