The opinion in support of the decision being
entered today is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper 18
Filed by: Trial Section Motions Panel
Box Interference Filed
Washington, D.C. 20231 February 3, 2003
Tel: 703-308-9797
Fax: 703-305-0942
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
HERMAN A. DEBOER, REIN STRIJKER,
HERBERT L. HEYNEKER, GERARD PLATENBURG, SANG HE LEE,
FRANK PIEPER, and PAUL J.A. KRIMPENFORT,
Junior Party
(Patent Nos. 5,741,957, 6,013,857, and 6,140,552),
v.
KATHERINE GORDON, SUZANNE GROET, LOTHAR HENNIGHAUSEN, and
HEINER WESTPHAL,
Senior Party
(Application 08/246,259).
_______________
Patent Interference 105,004
___________
Before: SCHAFER, TORCZON, and NAGUMO, Administrative Patent
Judges.
NAGUMO, Administrative Patent Judge.
JUDGMENT
(Under 37 C.F.R. § 1.640)
NO INTERFERENCE-IN-FACT
1. The parties have submitted a joint motion for judgment
that no interference-in-fact exists. (Paper No. 16, “JM”.)
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007