The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 14
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte HAN S. UHM
____________
Appeal No. 2000-1090
Application No. 09/086,990
___________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before KIMLIN, LIEBERMAN, and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judges.
LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judge.
ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING
Pursuant to the provisions of 37 CFR § 1.197(b) (1997), appellant has submitted
a timely Request for Rehearing (hereafter "Request") of our Decision dated September 9,
2002, affirming the following rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) of claims 1 and 3
through 8 as being clearly anticipated by Breault and claims 2, 9 and 10 as obvious over
Breault. The Request is limited to the affirmance of the rejection on the grounds of
anticipation.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007