The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today was not written for publication and
is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte SANTOKH S. BADESHA, GEORGE J. HEEKS,
ROBERT M. FERGUSON,
DAVID J. GERVASI and ARNOLD W. HENRY
_____________
Appeal No. 2003-0479
Application No. 09/416,148
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before KIMLIN, DELMENDO and POTEATE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
REQUEST FOR REHEARING
Appellants request rehearing of our decision of March 31,
2003, wherein we affirmed the examiner’s rejections of all the
appealed claims under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
We have thoroughly reviewed each of the arguments presented
in appellants’ Request. However, we remain of the opinion that
the burden is properly upon appellants to demonstrate that the
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007