The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 29
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte HARRY E. SHISLER and KEVIN D. REITZ
____________
Appeal No. 2002-0655
Application No. 08/743,201
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, KRASS, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through
29.
The disclosed invention relates to a programmable batch
processing engine for processing a batch application.
Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it reads
as follows:
1. A programmable batch processing engine, comprising:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007